VOTEFood For Thought
© copyrighted


Were The Votes Properly Counted
In Ohio and Elsewhere?
An In-Depth Analysis Of
Evidence & Data Says... No !

November 22, 2004 ~ Updated 12-6-2004
by columnist
David Lawrence Dewey
"Reading provides knowledge...
knowledge leads to answers."
SEARCH
HOME
Previous Columns

If you print this out, make sure you change your page setup to landscape from portrait so that the speadsheets will print properly.
NOTICE: IF YOU LINK TO THIS COLUMN, YOU MUST USE THIS URL: http://www.dldewey.com/vote04.htm

DO NOT POST THIS COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL ON ANY MESSAGE BOARD!


BREAKING NEWS 12-6-04
It Is All Starting To Unravel


Texas to Florida: White House-linked clandestine operation
paid for "vote switching" software

Special Report
December 6, 2004
By Wayne Madsen
Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist and syndicated columnist.
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/120604Madsen/120604madsen.html
Excerpts:

According to a notarized affidavit signed by Clint Curtis, while he was employed by the NASA Kennedy Space Center contractor, Yang Enterprises, Inc., during 2000, Feeney solicited him to write a program to "control the vote."

An exhaustive investigation has turned up a evidence between current Florida Republican Representative Tom Feeney, a customized Windows-based program to suppress Democratic votes on touch screen voting machines, a Florida computer services company with whom Feeney worked as a general counsel and registered lobbyist while he was Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, and top level officials of the Bush administration.

BREAKING NEWS 12-3-04
Hearing On Ohio Voting Irregularities Scheduled in Washington Dec. 8th


Democratic Representative John Conyers, Jr. of Michigan, ranking Minority member of the House Judiciary Committee, will hold a hearing on Wednesday 08 December 2004 to investigate allegations of vote fraud and irregularities in Ohio during the 2004 Presidential election. The hearing is slated to begin at 10:00 a.m. EST in the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington DC.

Democratic Representatives Melvin Watt and Robert Scott will also be centrally involved with the hearing. Rev. Jesse Jackson will be in attendance, along with Ralph Neas (President, People for the American Way), Jon Greenbaum (Director, Voting Rights Project, Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law), Ellie Smeal (Executive Director, The Feminist Majority), Bob Fitrakis ( The Free Press), Cliff Arnebeck (Arnebeck Associates), John Bonifaz (General Counsel, National Voting Institute), Steve Rosenfeld (Producer, Air America Radio), and Shawnta Walcott (Communications Director, Zogby International). Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell has been invited to attend.


Send an email to a friend about this column.

Were The Votes Properly Counted In Ohio and Elsewhere?

In Depth Special ReportReport

Since the election, I have received thousands of emails from Americans from all across the country expressing their opinions that they do not believe the votes were properly counted on election day in Ohio, Florida and other states. Many forwarded links to data supporting their opinions. Some of this so called information I found amusing. However, some of this information was simply to credible to dismiss.

Before I go any futher, I want to clarify something right off the bat. I have not written this column to create a controversy or to support a conspiracy theory in rigged voting. I could care less who actually won. The bottom line is very simple... the question is....were the votes properly counted for the correct candidates? If that did not happen, then there is a huge problem in this country of what our democracy is suppose to stand for.

Whether you be from the Republican, Democrat, Independent or Green party, as you read the information and facts in this column keep that simple truth in mind. This has nothing to do with party. It has to do with truth and justice, plain and simple. And quite frankly, if you do not want to accept that truth in how to look at this, then in my opinion, you do not stand for the American way of Democracy. Furthermore, if you sit idly by and do nothing to seek out the truth, then I feel sorry for you as an American. You simply don't get it. Now is not the time to simply sit back and say..."Oh well."

In this column you will read an in-depth analysis of the voting results posted 11-7-2004 by the State of Ohio for the Ohio election results. It is because of the irregularities that began to surface that this in-depth analysis was performed. But first here are a few examples of the irregularities that you have not heard about on the major networks because of a news blackout concerning this on the major networks.

On Saturday, November 13, the Ohio Election Protection Coalition’s public hearings in Columbus solicited extensive sworn first-person testimony from 32 of Ohio voters, precinct judges, poll workers, legal observers, party challengers. An additional 66 people provided written affidavits of election irregularities. The unavoidable conclusion is that this year's election in Ohio was deeply flawed, that thousands of Ohioans were denied their right to vote, and that the ultimate vote count is very much in doubt of just who really won Ohio.

The testimony has also revealed a widespread and concerted effort on the part of Republican Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell to deny primarily African-American and young voters the right to cast their ballots within a reasonable time. By depriving precincts of adequate numbers of functioning voting machines, Blackwell created waits of three to eleven hours, driving tens of thousands of likely Democratic voters away from the polls and very likely affecting the outcome of the Ohio vote count, which in turn decided the national election.

On November 17, Blackwell wrote an op-ed piece for Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Washington Times, stating: "Every eligible voter who wanted to vote had the opportunity to vote. There was no widespread fraud, and there was no disenfranchisement. A half-million more Ohioans voted than ever before with fewer errors than four years ago, a sure sign on success by any measure," Blackwell wrote. Moon's extreme right wing Unification Church has long-standing ties to the Bush Family and the Central Intelligence Agency.

As Blackwell supervised the Ohio vote he also served as co-chair of the Ohio Bush-Cheney re-election campaign, a clear conflict of interest that casts further doubt on how the Ohio election and vote counts have been conducted.

Werner Lange, a pastor from Youngstown, Ohio, stated in testimony, "In precincts 1 A and 5 G, voting at Hillman Elementary School, which is a predominantly African American community, there were woefully insufficient number of voting machines in three precincts. I was told that the standard was to have one voting machine per 100 registered voters. Precinct A had 750 registered voters. Precinct G had 690. There should have been 14 voting machines at this site. There were only 6, three per precinct, less than 50 percent of the standard. This caused an enormous bottleneck among voters who had to wait a very, very long time to vote, many of them giving up in frustration and leaving. . . . I estimate, by the way, that an estimated loss of over 8,000 votes from the African American community in the City of Youngstown alone, with its 84 precincts, were lost due to insufficient voting machines, and that would translate to some 7,000 votes lost for John Kerry for President in Youngstown alone."

Here are examples of irregularities in Ohio that have been reported by the Associated Press.

Votes Given To Bush in Error

In Columbus Ohio, an error with an electronic voting system gave President Bush 3,893 extra votes in suburban Columbus, elections officials said. Franklin County's unofficial results had Bush receiving 4,258 votes to Democrat John Kerry's 260 votes in a precinct in Gahanna. Records show only 638 voters cast ballots in that precinct. Bush's total should have been recorded as 365.

Ohio Secretary Kenneth Blackwell Nullifies Votes In Ohio

Kenneth Blackwell in Ohio has nullified 233 punch card votes after a poll worker, attempting to relieve voting congestion, took a punch machine from Precinct 3B to Precinct3A for his voters. This is unbelievable that someone would actually move a voting machine from one precinct to another during an election.

In doing additional research, I have found the following:

What is alarming are the current 33,371 incidents recorded through the Election Incident Reporting System - http://verifiedvoting.org/eirs.

Incidents have been reported in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

The EIRE is a coalition of approximately 60 organizations that have been accepting voter incidents and complaints.

Here are a couple of those organizations:

VoteProtect.org has registered 1,712 Incidents Nationwide of voting irregularities
https://voteprotect.org/index.php?display=EIRMapNation&tab=ED04&cat=02&start_time=&start_date=&end_time=&end_date=&search=

189 incidents have been reported in Ohio
https://voteprotect.org/index.php?display=EIRMapState&state=Ohio&cat=02&tab=ED04

These incidents of the specified type reported for the state of Ohio regarding Election Day 2004 were reported in the following counties: Clark, Cuyahoga, Delaware, Franklin, Fulton, Hamilton, Knox, Lucas, Mahoning, Miami, Montgomery, Portage, and Wood Counties. On the above link, you will see a map and below it, are links to the counties.

You can download these specific incidents in Excel spreadsheet format at: https://voteprotect.org/index.php?display=EIRExportMapState&state=Ohio&cat=02&tab=ED04

In addition, ElectionProtection2004.org is a coalition of 25,000 volunteers nationwide working to document thousands of voting problems that occurred on Election Day.

As of 11-13-2004 there have been 15,552 incidents reported nationwide through the EIRE.

If you experienced voting problem on election day or saw voting irregularties, please file your incident at the EIRE here, https://voteproblem.org/

In addition, I recently received several disturbing emails from journalist colleagues that work for various major news media outlets. Basically, what I've been told is that the decision makers at these major news media outlets decided there would be no reporting on any voting incidents or possible voter fraud. This causes me great alarm that the 5 major corporations that control 70% of the media in this country have taken this stance. What you are going to read in this column, you will not see on the Nightly News because the major news outlet had clamped down on any reporting of this.

In Ohio these are just some of the incidents that have been reported at various precincts within these counties. These are actual quotes from the incidents reported.

In Lucas county, "optical scanners broken. There's an emergency slot on the machine to store ballots, but it's full. Poll workers are removing ballots from the machine and storing in a brown cardboard box; telling voters that they will be scanned and counted later."

In Franklin county, "voter denied ballot because he was registered as independent in primary. Was finally allowed to vote. Voting machine did not allow him to vote for president, or for school board."

In Franklin county, "voter reported that Kerry light on the machine would not light up. Poll worker said that she would write it in later."

In Franklin county, "voters being turned away - machines are broken - they took name and phone # - poll workers said they would call back voters. None were called back. About 65 people total."

In Mahoning county, "voting machine not working; needed help to get machine to work; arrow moves to other candidates repeatedly; left hand on left side."

In Lucas county, "voting machine would not accept any ballots - paper ballots were collected."

In Franklin county, "went in and tried to vote for president, but nothing lit up even though he pressed an option. Pressed "vote" and the machine went to the next screen. Complained to official and was told that there was nothing they could do."

In Cuyahoga county, "3 of 9 voting machines in the precinct are broken. On 2 of the machines - when you pressed Kerry, it would register Bush."

In Lucas county, "machine not working, had to drop ballot in a slot on the side of the machine."

In Franklin county, "every machine is down - no voting allowed."

In Franklin county, "machines on battery - no electricity - 2 hours for batteries - worried machines are going to lose count.

In Lucas county, Ballot #220 came up 180. 177-178-179-180 ballot numbers don't match machine number. Concern that numbers aren't correct because of a jam. 2 Republican officials inside building, 1 Democrat inside."

In Mahoning county, "one of the three machines (#v0112442-C) in the precint was not properly recording votes. It was brought to the attention of presiding judge. Board of Elections was contacted and the machine was recalibrated by BOE employee at 9:35 a.m. It lost votes after being recalibrated. The machine was not closed between 7:40 a.m. and the time of recalibration so for over two hours the machine was not counting votes properly."

In Mahoning county, "man reported voting for one candidate but computer marked other candidate. This happened to him three times before he was finally able to submit his correct vote. "

In Mahoning county, "each time screen is touched for one party, it bounces to opposite party."

In Cuyahoga county, "Precinct 4-A has a faulty machine that doesn't punch through completely about 15-20% of the time. The precinct needs two more poll workers by rush hour. Judge Haynes has asked for the workers, but hasn't gotten them. because lines were extremely long this morning."

In Mahoning county, "voting machine number V0107749-C malfunctioning, screen flashes and scrolls, shows different results or no results. Was reported to officials, they did nothing."

In Mahoning county, "pressed Kerry button, another candidate came up (not Bush)! Third try and it finally it worked."

In Mahoning county, in one precinct, 20 incidents where voters tried to vote for Kerry but Bush came up.

In Mahoning county, "every time I tried to vote for the Democratic Party Presidential vote the machine went blank. I had to keep trying, it took 5 tries for it to take my vote."

In Mahoning county, "caller stated that machine (electronic) repeatedly marked her Democratic vote as Republican. Election worker had to restart and re-calibrate machine. States that many voters complained of this problem as they walked out of polling place as she was standing in line. She reported this to the Democratic Headquarters. She's worried her vote wasn't counted. Machine#V0114343-C."

In Franklin county, "voter used electronic voting system. She and other voters noticed two of the three booths had electronic counters which increased as each voter used it. However, the third booth's counting system did not increase. It was reported to election officials but election officials continued to allow use of the booth."

In Franklin county, officials refused to provide Provisional ballots.

In Franklin county, "7:30 AM - all three machines not working. Polls did not open on time. Poll workers taking names and numbers and telling people they will call them when they can vote. 3 people report they were never called and went back later that afternoon and polls were finally open at this precinct."

In Franklin county," voter reported that Kerry light on the machine would not light up. Poll worker said that he "would write it in later."

In Auglaize County, Ohio, in October, a former employee of Election Systems and Software (ES&S), the company that provides the voting system in Auglaize County, was allegedly on the main computer that is used to create the ballot and compile election results, which would go against election protocol. He was later fired and there has been no explanation as to why he was fired.

On this one trouble slip from a precinct in Ohio, Trouble Slip the person actually got the okay to re-format the hard drive on the voting machine, which as you know deleted all previous vote totals.

It is because of the irregularities and incidents that were reported that I decided to investigate this matter further.

There are many ways in which data from sources can be analyzed. However, what is most important is the type of data and how it is compared to other data. I decided to use the following data from Ohio to analyze the elections results from Ohio.

Population Census of counties of Ohio for 2000.
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/39000.html

Other Census Information Ohio
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/39000lk.html

Estimated Census Population of the counties of Ohio for 2003
http://www.census.gov/popest/counties/tables/CO-EST2003-01-39.pdf
Annual Estimate Populations 2003 for the counties of Ohio
Source: U.S. Populaton Division, U.S. Census Bureau
Release April 1, 2004

Ohio Election Results - 2000
http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/results/2000/gen/presidential_results_00.htm

2004 Voter Turnout in Ohio
http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/results/2004/gen/voterTurn.htm

Un-Official Election results by county - election of 2004 - (pulled from Ohio Election Site 11-7-2004 )
http://serform.sos.state.oh.us/sos/results/2004/gen/pres.htm

Democractic Primary in Ohio 2004
http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/results/2004/pri/demPres.htm

Republican Primary in Ohio 2004
http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/results/2004/pri/repPres.htm

Historical Election Data of Ohio
http://serform.sos.state.oh.us/sos/results/index.html

Type of Voting Machines By County In Ohio
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/verifier/map.php?&topic_string=5std&state=Ohio

You can download the type of voting machines in a text file by county here:
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/verifier/getMapData.php?&topic_string=5std&state=Ohio

Before I expand on the Ohio data analysis results, listed briefly are other voting irregularities that have been found in other states.

Florida

UsTogether.org has reported strange irregularites.

While the heavily scrutinized touch-screen voting machines in Florida seemed to produce results in which the registered Democrat/Republican ratios largely matched the Kerry/Bush vote, in Florida's counties using optically scanned paper ballots the results seem to contain severe anomalies. Mathematicians are in the process of investigating the November 2004 election results in Florida. Here is example of some very strong irregularities:

In Baker County, where 69.3% of the voters are registered as Democratic, Bush supposedly won by a 7,738 to 2,180 margin. For this to be possible, Bush would have had to have gotten the votes of every single Republican and 4,500 of the roughly 7,000 Democrats and independents.

In Calhoun County, where 82.4% of voters are Democrat, Putsch won the vote by a 3,780 to 2,116 margin. There are less than a thousand Republicans in that county.

In Bradford County: 61.4% are Democrats... Bush supposedly won by 7,553 to 3,244.

In Dixie county, roughly 1,500 Republicans were able to deliver 4,433 votes for Bush. And supposedly the 7,700 Democrats only have 1,959 votes to Kerry?

It goes on and on. Florida has a lot of counties, and nearly all of them show these discrepancies. In all, Democrats came up short by about 430,000 votes, and the Republicans had 1,023,000 more votes than the models would have predicted.

An analysis reported on by Thom Hartmann found that in Florida, in the smaller counties in which optically scanned ballots were counted on a central computer, the results were quite surprising. For example, in Franklin County with 77.3 percent registered Democrats, 58.5 percent went to Bush. In Holmes County, with 72.7 percent registered Democrats, 77.25 percent went to Bush. "Yet in the larger counties," Hartmann noted, "where such anomalies would be more obvious to the news media, high percentages of registered Democrats equaled high percentages of votes for Kerry. Despite that elections officials have not noticed these anomalies, in aggregate they are enough to swing Florida from Kerry to Bush. If you simply go through the analysis of these counties and reverse the 'anomalous' numbers in those counties that appear to have been hacked, suddenly the Florida election results resemble the Florida exit poll results: Kerry won, and won big."

According to Hartmann, the Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives from Florida's 16th District, Jeff Fisher, claims to have evidence of hacking that would explain these results. Fisher is supposedly turning that evidence over to the FBI. Beverly Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org explained how easy such hacking is on the CNBC show some months back.

On November 18th, a research team at UC Berkeley reported Thursday morning that irregularities associated with electronic voting machines may have awarded 130,000 - 260,000 or more in excess votes to President George W. Bush in Florida in the 2004 presidential election. The study showed an unexplained discrepancy between votes for President Bush in counties where electronic voting machines were used versus counties using traditional voting methods.

In my analysis below for Ohio, you will see what they are talking about in Ohio as well.

But let's get back to the Ohio results and the data looked at.

Voting By Machine Types Varies By Percentage In Counties


The following graph spreadsheet below lists by county the population for each county, comparing the 2000 election to the 2004 election. Race figures are broken down as well. The population figures were taken from the 2000 Census for Ohio, and the estimated 2003 population also from the U.S. Census Department.

The 2000 population and registered voters are listed and compared to the 2004 population and registered voters for each county. Each county reflects an increase or decrease.

31 counties experienced a total population decrease of approximately 84,188, or an average of 1.53% population decrease overall in the 31 counties. There was an increase of registered voters of 51,860 from 2000 to 2004 or and increase of 1.39% of registered voters in these counties: 3,739,726 registered voters in 2000 versus 3,791,586 registered voters in 2004. The turnout rate was 70.10% of registered voters voted, or 2,658,214 votes cast.

Total population in these counties in 2000 was, 5,503,963 with 4,377,878 White, 922,934 Black, 119,753 Hispanic and 203,751 of Asian or of two or more races. The 2003 estimated population dropped to 5,419,775. No breakdowns according to race were available for 2003 estimated population so percentages were applied based on growth of population in that county accordingly by race.

According to total votes cast in these 31 counties,2,658,214, Kerry took 10 of these 31 counties with1,402,166 , [51.75%] votes compared to Bush taking 21 counties with, 1,193,402 votes,[ 44.89%] of the vote. 62,646 votes, [2.36%] when to other candidates on the ballot. Kerry won overall in these 31 counties but by only 208,764 votes or 7.85%. In these counties, the Black population was approximately 16.7%, Hispanic population was 2.18%, Other races were 3.70%, leaving approximately, 77.47% of the population White.

What is interesting in these 31 counties, in two of them, Belmont and Monroe, where the Black population/registered voters was .05%, approximately 1,818 votes, Kerry took Belmont with 17,256 votes or 51.58% of the votes cast, Monroe with 4,164 votes or 53.00% of the votes cast. Between these two counties that was 2,775 more votes when there was only approximately only 1,818 registered black votes. I am pointing this out because this shows that the white population was voting for Kerry, however, this does not show up in other counties. In these two counties the excuse that the black vote won Kerry in these counties cannot be used. Isn't this odd that in these two counties it shows a high percentage of white voters voting for Kerry, but not it others?

In these 31 counties, approximately 55,625 provisional ballots were still to counted in the counties that Kerry took,

What is puzzling in these counties are these findings from the analysis.

There were 347,309 more votes cast in 2004 than in 2000. Votes for the Republican candidate increased in 2004 by 12.67% 151,261 more republican votes casts when compared to the 2000 votes cast. However Democrats showed a 14.89% increase in votes in 2004 over 2000, 208,744 more Democrat votes.

In 2000, in these counties 61.79% of registered voters voted. In 2004, that percentage increased to 70.11%, or 8.32% more registered voters voted in 2004 than in 2000.

The total votes in these counties represented 42.68% of the overall votes cast for Bush among all counties. For Kerry, it was 52.72%. Votes for other candidates was 3.12% of total votes cast for other candidates.

Jefferson County experienced a 10.17% decrease in population or 5,553 less people living in the county. Taken from Ohio State election records, there were 5,623 less registered voters as compared to the 2000 election. Yet, the votes cast for Bush was 12.30% above the 2000 votes cast, or 1,849 votes higher, while Kerry experienced only a 6.78% increase or 1,188 vote increase. These numbers simply do not not add up.

When checking to see what type of voting method was used in Jefferson County, it was the good old punch card system like that which was used in Florida by Election Systems Software Inc. This is known to have an error rate of as much as 15%.

The counties that were won by Bush are highlighted in "yellow" in the population columns. These are additional examples that something is not right in Ohio. For example, in Marion County, Bush took the county. However, the findings from this analysis do not support that.

In Marion, the population increased from 66,217 in 2000 to 66,396 in 2003 Ohio estimates. This was approximately, a 179 population increase. Registered voters increased from 41,788 in 2000 to 43,423 in 2004. or a whopping 1,535 increase in registered voters. Marion's Black, Hispanic and other races population totaled 6,044 or approximately 9.10% of the population. Total votes cast in 2000 was 24,815 or 59.38% of registered voters voted. In 2004, total votes cast were 28,762, or 66.29% of registered voters voted, an increase of 10.42%. However, according to votes cast in 2004, there was a 22.85% increase over 2000, or 3,112 in votes cast for the Republican ticket, as compared to only an increase of 10.82%, or 1,122 votes for the Democrat ticket. when compared to 2000. If you take the 10.42% increase in registered voters voting in 2004, and look at Kerry's low 10.82% of increase votes, this actually represents that Kerry only received approximately .40% of the increased voters voting, [10.82% increase in registered voters (minis) the 10.42% increase in voters in 2004].

When you compare this low .40% net increase to Bush's net gain of 12.03%, [22.85% increased votes over 2000 (minus) the 10.42% in increased registered voters = 12.03%], this is simply too hard to believe that Kerry only received less than 1/2 of one percent of new registered voters in this county.

Futhermore, 29 precincts in Cuyahoga County, reported votes cast in excess of the number of registered voters by at least 93,136 extra votes total. These numbers are posted on the official Cuyahoga County Board of Elections website: http://boe.cuyahogacounty.us/BOE/results/currentresults1.htm#top

The precincts involved are:

Bay Village - 13,710 registered voters - however ,18,663 ballots were cast
Beachwood - 9,943 registered voters - however, 13,939 ballots were cast
Bedford - 9,942 registered voters - however, 14,465 ballots were cast
Bedford Heights - 8,142 registered voters - however, 13,512 ballots were cast
Brooklyn - 8,016 registered voters - however, 12,303 ballots were cast
Brooklyn Heights - 1,144 registered voters - however, 1,869 ballots were cast
Chagrin Falls Village - 3,557 registered voters - however, 4,860 ballots were cast
Cuyahoga Heights - 570 registered voters - however, 1,382 ballots were cast
Fairview Park - 13,342 registered voters - however, 18,472 ballots were cast
Highland Hills Village - 760 registered voters - however, 8,822 ballots were cast
Independence - 5,735 registered voters - however, 6,226 ballots were cast
Mayfield Village - 2,764 registered voters - however, 3,145 ballots were cast
Middleburg Heights - 12,173 registered voters - however, 14,854 ballots were cast
Moreland Hills Village - 2,990 registered voters - however, 4,616 ballots were cast
North Olmstead - 25,794 registered voters - however, 25,887 ballots were cast
Olmstead Falls - 6,538 registered voters - however, 7,328 ballots were cast
Pepper Pike - 5,131 registered voters - however, 6,479 ballots were cast
Rocky River - 16,600 registered voters - however, 20,070 ballots were cast
Solon (WD6) - 2,292 registered voters - however, 4,300 ballots were cast
South Euclid - 16,902 registered voters - however, 16,917 ballots were cast
Strongsville (WD3) - 7,806 registered voters - however, 12,108 ballots were cast
University Heights - 10,072 registered voters - however, 11,982 ballots were cast
Valley View Village - 1,787 registered voters - however, 3,409 ballots were cast
Warrensville Heights - 10,562 registered voters - however, 15,039 ballots were cast
Woodmere Village - 558 registered voters - however, 8,854 ballots were cast
Bedford (CSD) - 22,777 registered voters - however, 27,856 ballots were cast
Independence (LSD) - 5,735 registered voters - however, 6,226 ballots were cast
Orange (CSD) - 11,640 registered voters - however, 22,931 ballots were cast
Warrensville (CSD) - 12,218 registered voters - however, 15,822 ballots were cast

Something is terribly wrong here.

Kerry lost Ohio by approximately 130,000, so this is not an insignificant figure that can be ignored.

There are many similar questionable anomalies in other counties as well.

In the graph spreadsheets below, you will notice (10) other counties that are red in the county column, representing that Bush won this county. However, in the population columns for these counties, the race totals are highlighted in yellow. These counties are similar to the anomalies found in Marion county. Pay attention also to the far right column that reflects a decrease in registered voters when computed to population in that county. One in particular was Athens county showing a 7.66% decrease in registered voters to population. Yet, this county was won by Kerry with a 7.01% decrease in registered voters to population. The same thing occured in many of the counties that are showing a decrease computation.

The voting type methods have been color coded in the spreadsheet below
County Voting
Machine
Type
Number
Precincts
2000
Number
Precincts
2004
2000
Census
Population
2000
Census
White
2000
Census
Black
2000
Census
Hispanic
2000
Census
Others
Ohio
State
Estimated
2003
Population
Percent
Increase
Decrease
Increase
Decrease
Population
Number
2000
Registered
Voters
2004
Registered
Voters
Increase
Decrease
Registered
Voters
Increase
Decrease
% Registered
Voters
Percent
Population
Registered
Voters
2000
Percent
Population
Registered
Voters
2004
Net
Difference
Adams P1 35 35 27,330 27,030 48 175 252 28,026 2.55% 696 17,650 17,696 46 0.26% 64.58% 63.14% -1.44%
Allen OP1 171 139 108,473 92,147 13,225 1,545 3,101 108,241 -0.21% -232 67,950 68,174 224 0.33% 62.64% 62.98% 0.34%
Ashland OP2 65 65 52,523 51,231 424 339 868 53,749 2.33% 1,226 30,988 34,847 3,859 12.45% 59.00% 64.83% 5.83%
Ashtabula P2 127 127 102,728 96,635 3,247 2,292 2,846 103,120 0.38% 392 66,390 62,926 -3,464 -5.22% 64.63% 61.02% -3.60%
Athens P1 69 69 62,223 58,166 1,485 639 2,572 64,380 3.47% 2,157 48,356 45,100 -3,256 -6.73% 77.71% 70.05% -7.66%
Auglaize E1 43 39 46,611 45,735 110 310 766 46,740 0.28% 129 28,693 33,094 4,401 15.34% 61.56% 70.80% 9.25%
Belmont P1 85 83 70,226 66,698 2,553 274 975 69,636 -0.84% -590 51,504 44,452 -7,052 -13.69% 73.34% 63.83% -9.51%
Brown P2 44 35 42,285 41,474 389 185 422 43,807 3.60% 1,522 26,955 28,922 1,967 7.30% 63.75% 66.02% 2.28%
Butler P1 280 289 332,807 303,510 17,531 4,771 11,766 343,207 3.12% 10,400 216,275 238,117 21,842 10.10% 64.99% 69.38% 4.39%
Carroll P1 26 26 28,836 28,316 155 158 365 29,599 2.65% 763 19,075 20,076 1,001 5.25% 66.15% 67.83% 1.68%
Champaign P2 50 29 38,890 37,230 894 269 766 39,544 1.68% 654 26,792 25,376 -1,416 -5.29% 68.89% 64.17% -4.72%
Clark P2 112 100 144,742 127,541 12,954 1,699 4,247 143,351 -0.96% -1,391 89,550 89,683 133 0.15% 61.87% 62.56% 0.69%
Clermont OP2 191 191 177,977 172,866 1,621 1,547 3,490 185,799 4.39% 7,822 114,186 125,823 11,637 10.19% 64.16% 67.72% 3.56%
Clinton P2 36 32 40,453 38,917 886 266 650 41,756 3.22% 1,303 24,023 25,092 1,069 4.45% 59.38% 60.09% 0.71%
Columbiana P2 103 103 112,075 108,071 2,468 1,309 1,536 111,523 -0.49% -552 74,297 78,536 4,239 5.71% 66.29% 70.42% 4.13%
Coshocton OP2 43 43 36,655 35,685 399 216 571 37,132 1.30% 477 21,066 22,679 1,613 7.66% 57.47% 61.08% 3.61%
Crawford P1 67 46 46,966 46,022 279 361 665 46,091 -1.86% -875 31,344 29,591 -1,753 -5.59% 66.74% 64.20% -2.54%
Cuyahoga P1 1,505 1,436 1,393,978 938,863 382,634 47,078 72,481 1,363,888 -2.16% -30,090 1,010,726 1,005,807 -4,919 -0.49% 72.51% 73.75% 1.24%
Darke P2 53 43 53,309 52,290 208 457 811 52,960 -0.65% -349 36,088 38,290 2,202 6.10% 67.70% 72.30% 4.60%
Definace P2 46 42 39,500 36,575 692 2,857 2,233 39,054 -1.13% -446 25,783 25,847 64 0.25% 65.27% 66.18% 0.91%
Delaware P1 111 123 109,989 103,663 2,774 1,109 3,552 132,797 20.74% 22,808 80,132 100,676 20,544 25.64% 72.85% 75.81% 2.96%
Erie OP2 101 62 79,551 70,514 6,876 1,664 2,161 78,709 -1.06% -842 55,777 55,517 -260 -0.47% 70.11% 70.53% 0.42%
Fairfield P1 118 118 122,759 116,803 3,274 993 2,682 132,549 7.97% 9,790 81,544 91,498 9,954 12.21% 66.43% 69.03% 2.60%
Fayette P1 40 38 28,433 27,182 589 352 662 28,158 -0.97% -275 14,713 16,093 1,380 9.38% 51.75% 57.15% 5.41%
Franklin E2 760 788 1,068,978 806,851 191,196 24,279 70,931 1,088,944 1.87% 19,966 681,949 845,720 163,771 24.02% 63.79% 77.66% 13.87%
Fulton P2 36 35 42,084 40,254 103 2,422 1,727 42,446 0.86% 362 27,840 28,561 721 2.59% 66.15% 67.29% 1.13%
Gallia P2 36 35 31,069 29,596 839 191 634 31,398 1.06% 329 21,681 23,567 1,886 8.70% 69.78% 75.06% 5.28%
Geauga OP2 93 96 90,985 88,553 1,110 538 1,322 93,941 3.25% 2,956 62,518 65,393 2,875 4.60% 68.71% 69.61% 0.90%
Guernsey P2 140 142 147,886 131,975 9,414 1,813 6,497 151,257 2.28% 3,371 98,261 105,079 6,818 6.94% 66.44% 69.47% 3.03%
Greene P2 71 37 40,792 39,275 623 254 894 41,362 1.40% 570 24,452 27,129 2,677 10.95% 59.94% 65.59% 5.65%
Hamilton P1 1,025 1,013 845,303 616,487 198,061 9,514 30,755 823,472 -2.58% -21,831 585,985 573,612 -12,373 -2.11% 69.32% 69.66% 0.34%
Hancock OP2 67 62 71,295 67,832 789 2,187 2,674 73,133 2.58% 1,838 46,334 49,607 3,273 7.06% 64.99% 67.83% 2.84%
Hardin OP1 38 38 31,945 31,159 224 248 562 31,608 -1.05% -337 19,716 18,921 -795 -4.03% 61.72% 59.86% -1.86%
Harrison P2 24 24 15,856 15,300 348 59 208 15,967 0.70% 111 11,052 11,769 717 6.49% 69.70% 73.71% 4.01%
Henry P2 33 33 29,210 27,845 169 1,576 1,196 29,318 0.37% 108 19,503 19,685 182 0.93% 66.77% 67.14% 0.37%
Highland P2 46 31 40,875 39,599 612 216 664 41,963 2.66% 1,088 24,818 28,243 3,425 13.80% 60.72% 67.30% 6.59%
Hocking P2 31 32 28,241 27,547 259 124 435 28,644 1.43% 403 16,881 18,378 1,497 8.87% 59.77% 64.16% 4.39%
Holmes P2 27 19 38,943 38,564 127 292 252 40,681 4.46% 1,738 16,766 18,089 1,323 7.89% 43.05% 44.47% 1.41%
Huron P2 69 55 59,487 57,094 575 2,117 1,818 60,231 1.25% 744 37,533 37,436 -97 -0.26% 63.09% 62.15% -0.94%
Jackson P2 40 38 32,641 31,953 193 197 495 33,074 1.33% 433 23,118 23,997 879 3.80% 70.83% 72.56% 1.73%
Jefferson P1 108 91 73,894 68,341 4,200 459 1,353 71,888 -2.71% -2,006 55,278 49,655 -5,623 -10.17% 74.81% 69.07% -5.73%
Knox E3 51 56 54,500 53,226 3,676 371 -2,402 56,930 4.46% 2,430 35,140 36,971 1,831 5.21% 64.48% 64.94% 0.46%
Lake E4 217 217 227,511 217,041 4,527 3,879 5,943 228,878 0.60% 1,367 152,858 160,165 7,307 4.78% 67.19% 69.98% 2.79%
Lawrence P1 84 84 62,319 60,169 1,302 355 848 62,550 0.37% 231 44,032 41,424 -2,608 -5.92% 70.66% 66.23% -4.43%
Licking P1 139 122 145,491 139,147 290 1,107 6,054 150,634 3.53% 5,143 98,787 111,387 12,600 12.75% 67.90% 73.95% 6.05%
Logan P2 52 52 46,005 44,233 786 332 986 46,411 0.88% 406 30,494 29,406 -1,088 -3.57% 66.28% 63.36% -2.92%
Lorain P2 246 239 284,664 243,514 24,203 19,676 16,947 291,164 2.28% 6,500 185,982 196,601 10,619 5.71% 65.33% 67.52% 2.19%
Lucas OP1 548 495 455,054 352,678 77,268 20,670 25,108 454,216 -0.18% -838 298,505 302,136 3,631 1.22% 65.60% 66.52% 0.92%
Madison P2 44 44 40,213 36,896 2,511 294 806 40,624 1.02% 411 23,221 23,477 256 1.10% 57.75% 57.79% 0.05%
Mahoning E5 416 312 257,555 208,727 40,884 7,640 7,944 251,660 -2.29% -5,895 179,545 194,673 15,128 8.43% 69.71% 77.36% 7.64%
Marion P2 90 84 66,217 60,896 3,805 723 1,516 66,396 0.27% 179 41,788 43,323 1,535 3.67% 63.11% 65.25% 2.14%
Medina P3 146 149 151,095 146,956 1,323 1,399 2,816 161,641 6.98% 10,546 102,535 118,330 15,795 15.40% 67.86% 73.21% 5.34%
Meigs P2 27 27 23,072 22,548 159 138 365 23,242 0.74% 170 16,242 15,205 -1,037 -6.38% 70.40% 65.42% -4.98%
Mercer P2 40 37 40,924 40,286 39 470 599 40,933 0.02% 9 25,079 31,306 6,227 24.83% 61.28% 76.48% 15.20%
Miami OP2 82 82 98,868 94,694 1,932 721 2,242 100,230 1.38% 1,362 66,765 72,169 5,404 8.09% 67.53% 72.00% 4.47%
Monroe P2 29 29 15,180 14,986 40 62 154 14,927 -1.67% -253 11,156 10,350 -806 -7.22% 73.49% 69.34% -4.15%
Montgomery P2 643 588 559,062 428,084 111,030 7,096 19,948 552,187 -1.23% -6,875 371,790 391,914 20,124 5.41% 66.50% 70.97% 4.47%
Morgan P2 22 22 14,897 13,952 508 61 437 14,843 -0.36% -54 9,405 9,358 -47 -0.50% 63.13% 63.05% -0.09%
Morrow P3 36 36 31,628 31,111 85 183 432 33,568 6.13% 1,940 21,184 24,249 3,065 14.47% 66.98% 72.24% 5.26%
Muskingum P2 85 85 84,585 79,438 3,392 436 1,755 85,423 0.99% 838 54,355 51,552 -2,803 -5.16% 64.26% 60.35% -3.91%
Noble P2 27 27 14,058 13,010 940 60 108 14,054 -0.03% -4 8,408 8,879 471 5.60% 59.81% 63.18% 3.37%
Ottawa OP2 78 78 40,985 39,576 265 1,535 1,144 41,192 0.51% 207 28,726 30,251 1,525 5.31% 70.09% 73.44% 3.35%
Paulding P2 30 30 20,293 19,451 194 612 648 19,665 -3.09% -628 14,104 14,226 122 0.87% 69.50% 72.34% 2.84%
Perry P2 46 46 34,078 33,581 74 152 423 35,074 2.92% 996 18,102 23,480 5,378 29.71% 53.12% 66.94% 13.82%
Pickaway E3 52 53 52,727 48,482 3,391 333 854 51,723 -1.90% -1,004 29,155 30,045 890 3.05% 55.29% 58.09% 2.79%
Pike P2 24 24 27,695 26,786 246 155 663 28,194 1.80% 499 20,396 19,661 -735 -3.60% 73.65% 69.73% -3.91%
Portage P2 122 129 152,061 143,545 4,840 1,093 3,676 154,870 1.85% 2,809 100,554 109,565 9,011 8.96% 66.13% 70.75% 4.62%
Preble P2 46 45 42,337 41,691 136 181 510 42,417 0.19% 80 27,718 28,137 419 1.51% 65.47% 66.33% 0.86%
Putnam P2 51 35 34,726 33,426 58 1,521 1,242 34,754 0.08% 28 24,105 24,572 467 1.94% 69.41% 70.70% 1.29%
Richland P1 131 126 128,852 113,600 12,151 1,200 3,101 128,267 -0.45% -585 82,059 95,359 13,300 16.21% 63.68% 74.34% 10.66%
Ross E3 76 76 73,345 67,288 4,544 429 1,513 74,424 1.47% 1,079 39,400 43,463 4,063 10.31% 53.72% 58.40% 4.68%
Sandusky OP2 90 72 61,792 56,974 1,650 4,298 3,168 61,753 -0.06% -39 40,769 39,408 -1,361 -3.34% 65.98% 63.82% -2.16%
Scioto P1 107 106 79,195 75,139 2,163 477 1,893 77,453 -2.20% -1,742 49,729 48,012 -1,717 -3.45% 62.79% 61.99% -0.80%
Seneca P2 73 54 58,683 55,770 1,033 1,972 1,880 57,734 -1.62% -949 35,917 37,974 2,057 5.73% 61.21% 65.77% 4.57%
Shelby P1 67 35 47,910 46,011 714 383 1,185 48,566 1.37% 656 29,578 28,460 -1,118 -3.78% 61.74% 58.60% -3.14%
Stark P1 364 364 378,098 341,342 27,219 3,492 9,537 377,519 -0.15% -579 240,794 267,939 27,145 11.27% 63.69% 70.97% 7.29%
Summit P4 624 475 542,899 453,336 71,608 4,781 17,955 546,773 0.71% 3,874 354,189 368,858 14,669 4.14% 65.24% 67.46% 2.22%
Trumbull P1 284 274 225,116 203,084 17,778 1,794 4,254 221,785 -1.48% -3,331 145,019 142,548 -2,471 -1.70% 64.42% 64.27% -0.15%
Tuscarawas P1 81 81 90,914 88,976 663 650 1,275 91,706 0.87% 792 57,546 55,656 -1,890 -3.28% 63.30% 60.69% -2.61%
Union P2 47 46 40,909 38,965 1,149 309 795 43,750 6.94% 2,841 25,981 30,200 4,219 16.24% 63.51% 69.03% 5.52%
Van Wert P2 39 39 29,659 28,896 222 462 541 29,277 -1.29% -382 21,841 21,100 -741 -3.39% 73.64% 72.07% -1.57%
Vinton P1 20 20 12,806 12,560 45 60 201 13,231 3.32% 425 8,595 8,527 -68 -0.79% 67.12% 64.45% -2.67%
Warren P2 142 157 158,383 149,919 4,327 1,633 4,137 181,743 14.75% 23,360 96,536 125,919 29,383 30.44% 60.95% 69.28% 8.33%
Washington OP2 81 56 63,251 61,563 585 324 1,103 62,505 -1.18% -746 40,969 40,881 -88 -0.21% 64.77% 65.40% 0.63%
Wayne P1 100 97 111,564 107,677 1,749 837 2,138 113,121 1.40% 1,557 62,395 69,672 7,277 11.66% 55.93% 61.59% 5.66%
Williams P1 44 44 39,188 37,821 283 1,049 1,084 38,802 -0.98% -386 26,683 26,772 89 0.33% 68.09% 69.00% 0.91%
Wood P2 104 105 121,065 114,802 1,540 4,033 4,723 123,020 1.61% 1,955 84,715 91,492 6,777 8.00% 69.97% 74.37% 4.40%
Wyandot P1 40 24 22,908 22,429 32 334 447 22,826 -0.36% -82 15,167 15,834 667 4.40% 66.21% 69.37% 3.16%
Totals *** 12,152 11,360 11,353,140 9,645,671 1,301,916 217,123 405,553 11,435,798 0.73% 82,658 7,531,555 7,979,639 448,084 5.95% 66.34% 69.78% 3.44%


Votes By Voting Method ~ Registered Voters ~ Total Votes For Candidates

Below is the data above that has been grouped by voting type methods. It has been expanded to include the number of registered voters by voting machine type with the total number of counties involved, the total votes casts on the various voting machines types and the percentage breakdown of votes going to Bush and Kerry by voting machine type and counties. This data was taken from the un-official results from the Ohio State website on 11-5-2004. As of 11-5-2004, the data for each county was showing 85,228 provisional ballots still to be counted. The total of provisional ballots for each voting method type is listed also.

Under each grouping are the results of where the votes went to each candidate by race,etc. as explained earlier.

But first, this needs to be explained so you understand how we arrived a our analysis of the Ohio vote 2004.

How The Total Votes For Each Race Group
White, Black, Hispanic and Other Races Was Computed:

Population precentages for each race group per county was computed using the 2003 U.S. Census population. [released April 2004], figures for each county. Population for each county by race was then determined. Using the percentage of 74.60%, [ from the U.S. Census ], of the population that is over 18 and eligible to vote, it was then determined per county how many in each race group was eliglible to vote.

Taking the registered voters in each county versus the calculated race population in each county, and applying the race percentages for each race group, it was determined in each county how many votes were of each race group. Taking the total of registered voters in each county, these percentages by race was applied to arrive at the number of eligible votes over 18 per race Using the turnout rate, votes cast versus total of registered voters, this established approximately how many out of each race group voted. This is the total votes you are seeing calculated for each race group for each county.

How The Total Votes From Each Race Group Were Allocated To The Candidates:

Using surveys taken on the Black, Hispanic and Other race communites is how the percentages were arrived at to allocate to each candidate, Bush, Kerry and Other Candidates. One such prestigious survey is the recent Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies poll study on the black vote for 2004. Conducted between September 15th and October 10th, 2004, 1,642 blacks from all walks of life were surveyed concerning who they would vote for in this election.

You can download the study here: [ it is a large .pdf file and will take sometime to download ].

http://www.jointcenter.org/publications/details/opinion-poll/nop-Politics.pdf

In the Joint Center study, it was determined that 78% of blacks would be voting for Kerry, 16% for Bush, 2% for other candidates. 4% were undecided. This 4% was split between Bush and Kerry. In the calculations, 80% of the black vote was calculated going to Kerry, 18% to Bush and 2% to other candidates. These percentages that the Joint Center found were very close to polls taken across the country as well both before and after the election among the black community.

Using several Hispanic surveys from six regions of the country, it was determined that 44% would be voting for Bush on an average and 53% would be voting for Kerry, with 3% voting for other candidates.

Using several other race surveys, it was determined that 30% of other races would be voting for Bush, 69% for Kerry and 1% for other candidates.

Using the calculated total votes per Black, Hispanic and other races as explained above, the following percentages were applied to arrive at the total votes for Blacks, Hispanics and other races for each candidate.

Since it was known how many total votes were cast in each county, the above totals for each race per candidate was subtracted from the total votes per Republican and Democat votes cast. This left a remaining total of White votes to be calculated between Bush and Kerry. Using the total percentage that the Republicans and Democrat vote received in each county, this percentage was applied to the remaining white race votes remaining in each county for each candidate, resulting in the totals in the analysis.

This is an in-depth analysis of the votes in Ohio by county, by race, by candidate and is very accurate, reflecting where the votes went from each race and to which candidate.

In doing such an in-depth analysis by county, then grouping the various voting type methods, a set of percentages alarming percentages began to emerge that provides some startling evidence that the vote in Ohio evidently was not properly calculated for each candidate.

In the analysis, one sees an example in this pattern:

In punch card type voting supplied by Triad Governmental Systems Inc. in 41 counties in Ohio, the results show that Kerry only received 42.64% of the actual vote in those counties. And it gets worse. Punch card voting supplied by Fidlar Doubleday Software Inc. in 2 counties show that Kerry only received 40.91% of the actual vote. Optical scan voting in 10 counties supplied by Election Systems Software Inc. show Kerry only received 36.25% of the actual vote in those counties. And it gets even worse.

In 1 county which used Election Systems Software new electronic voting machine, Kerry is showing only receiving 25.43% of the actual vote.

In 3 counties using new electronic voting supplied by Microvote Software, Kerry is showing only receiving 39.31% of the vote. Yet, in another county using electronic voting supplied by Election Systems Software, Kerry received 61.77% of the actual vote. The difference between the two later types of electronic voting is this.

The 3 counties showing 39.31% for Kerry , total votes casts for all candidate was 80,642. 91.90% of that vote came from White voters. 6.76% came from Black race voters. The election county results show 61.77% for Kerry of total votes cast for a total of 131,938 votes. 79.00% of the vote came from White voters, 17.58% came from Black voters.

Lets look at these two examples in depth.

Example A: 3 counties with 91.90% White voters, 6.76% Black voters, 39.31% of all votes went to Kerry.

Example B: 1 county with 79.00% White voters, 17.58% Black voters, 61.77% of all votes went to Kerry.

Example A had 12.90% more White voters, or 30,121 than Example B. Example B had 10.82% or 17,748 more Black Voters than Example A. At 80% of the Black vote voting for Kerry, this would represent Kerry picking up approximately 14,198 more black votes in Example B than in Example A groupings. However, Bush would have picked up 5,421 White votes as well. This is a net difference in favor of Kerry of 8,777 votes. In example A, the 3 counties had 80,642 total votes cast, while example B had 131,938 total votes cast, a difference of 51,296 votes.

There is no way that Kerry could have received 61.77% of the actual vote in Example B.

I am presenting this example first concerning Kerry so that no one can accuse me that I am presenting this data to favor any candidate. This analysis was not performed to favor one candidate over the other. This analysis was performed to show if the votes were properly calculated in Ohio for the correct candidates.

There are other anomalies such as these that have been discovered by doing this in-depth analysis of race, population and votes. As described above, there are some counties where Kerry should have received more votes and where Bush should have received more votes. The numbers reflect that something was amiss in Ohio on election day.

In a New York Times article titled "Computer Voting Is Open to Easy Fraud," it presented the troubling results of a detailed study by Johns Hopkins University. The study stated the following: "We found some stunning, stunning flaws. The systems....could be tricked by anyone with $100 worth of computer equipment. Ballots could be altered by anyone with access to a machine, so that a voter might think he is casting a ballot for one candidate while the vote is recorded for an opponent."

Read the entire article here, http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/24/technology/24VOTE.html

Breakdown of Votes By Type Of Voting Machine Type and Race

P1
Punch Card
3,143,963 Registered Voters
Total Votes
2,203,528
this method
70.09% voting
24 counties
15.95% is
Black/Hispanic/Other

39.40% of registered voters
Votes For Bush

1,050,205

47.66% of this voting method
Votes For
Kerry


1,100,746

49.95% of this voting method
Votes For
Other
Candidates


52,577

2.39% of this voting method
Provider of
Voting Machines:


Election Systems
Software Inc.

Votes Broken Down By Race For P1 Punch Card Method:

% of Vote Total Votes Race Republican
Votes
% of Votes Democrat
Votes
% of Votes Other
Candidates
Votes
% of Votes
15.11% 332,956 Black 59,932 18.00% 266,365 80.00% 6,659 2.00%
1.73% 38,118 Hispanic 16,772 44.00% 20,203 53.00% 1,144 3.00%
1.84% 40,502 Other Race 12,151 30.00% 27,496 69.00% 405 1.00%
81.32% 1,791,952 White 931,350 53.648% 786,232 43.876% 44,370 2.476%
100% 2,203,528 -Totals- 1,050,205 47.66% 1,100,176 49.95% 52,577 2.386%

Provisional Ballots Still To Be Counted: 38,362 for this type of voting and counties


P2
Punch Card
2,075,674 Registered Voters
Total Votes
1,470,311
this method
70.08% voting
41 counties

26.01% of registered voters
Votes For Bush

809,375

55.05% of this voting method
Votes For
Kerry


626,969

42.64% of this voting method
Votes For
Other
Candidates


33,967

2.31% of this voting method
Provider of
Voting Machines:


Triad
Governmental
Systems

Votes Broken Down By Race For P2 Punch Card Method:

% of Vote Total Votes Race Republican
Votes
% of Votes Democrat
Votes
% of Votes Other
Candidates
Votes
% of Votes
6.48% 95,311 Black 17,156 18.00% 76,249 80.00% 1,906 2.00%
2.04% 29,994 Hispanic 13,197 44.00% 10,319 53.00% 900 3.00%
1.02% 14,995 Other Race 4,487 30.00% 10,319 69.00% 150 1.00%
90.46% 1,330,051 White 774,535 58.234% 524,462 39.432% 31,011 2.332%
100% 1,470,311 -Totals- 809,735 55.05% 626,926 42.64% 33,967 2.310%

Provisional Ballots Still To Be Counted: 16,080 for this type of voting and counties


P3
Punch Card
142,579 Registered Voters
Total Votes
101,128
this method
70.93% voting
2 counties

1.79% of registered voters
Votes For Bush

57,812

57.17% of this voting method
Votes For
Kerry


41,376

40.91% of this voting method
Votes For
Other
Candidates


1,940

1.92% of this voting method
Provider of
Voting Machines:


Fidlar
Doubleday

Votes Broken Down By Race For P3 Punch Card Method:

% of Vote Total Votes Race Republican
Votes
% of Votes Democrat
Votes
% of Votes Other
Candidates
Votes
% of Votes
.77% 779 Black 140 18.00% 623 80.00% 16 2.00%
.87% 876 Hispanic 385 44.00% 464 53.00% 26 3.00%
.91% 922 Other Race 277 30.00% 636 69.00% 9 1.00%
97.45% 98,551 White 57,010 57.848% 39,652 40.236% 1,889 1.917%
100% 101,128 -Totals- 57,812 57.17% 41,376 40.91% 1,940 1.918%

Provisional Ballots Still To Be Counted: -0- for this type of voting and counties


P4
Punch Card
368,858 Registered Voters
Total Votes
275,551
this method
74.7% voting
1 counties

4.62% of registered voters
Votes For Bush

116,184

42.16% of this voting method
Votes For
Kerry


152,897

55.49% of this voting method
Votes For
Other
Candidates


6,470

2.35% of this voting method
Provider of
Voting Machines:


Technologies
International

Votes Broken Down By Race For P4 Punch Card Method:

% of Vote Total Votes Race Republican
Votes
% of Votes Democrat
Votes
% of Votes Other
Candidates
Votes
% of Votes
13.17% 36,293 Black 6,533 18.00% 29,034 80.00% 726 2.00%
.88% 2,423 Hispanic 1,066 44.00% 1,284 53.00% 73 3.00%
2.42% 6,677 Other Race 2,003 30.00% 4,607 69.00% 67 1.00%
83.53% 230,158 White 106,582 46.308% 117,972 51.257% 5,604 2.435%
100% 275,551 -Totals- 116,184 42.16% 152,897 55.49% 6,470 2.348%

Provisional Ballots Still To Be Counted: 5,932 for this type of voting and counties


Votes Broken Down By Race For OP1 Optical Scan Method:

OP1
Optical Scan
389,231 Registered Voters
Total Votes
277,720
this method
71.33% voting
3 counties

4.88% of registered voters
Votes For Bush

125,221

45.09% of this voting method
Votes For
Kerry


149,419

53.80% of this voting method
Votes For
Other
Candidates


3,080

1.11% of this voting method
Provider of
Voting Machines:


Diebold
Election
Systems
% of Vote Total Votes Race Republican
Votes
% of Votes Democrat
Votes
% of Votes Other
Candidates
Votes
% of Votes
15.23% 42,309 Black 7,616 18.00% 33,847 80.00% 846 2.00%
3.77% 10,476 Hispanic 4,609 44.00% 5,552 53.00% 314 3.00%
1.06% 2,942 Other Race 883 30.00% 2,030 69.00% 29 1.00%
79.93% 221,993 White 112,113 50.503% 107,990 48.646% 1,890 0.851%
100% 227,719 -Totals- 125,221 45.09%% 149,919 53.80% 3,080 1.109%

Provisional Ballots Still To Be Counted: 6,719 for this type of voting and counties


OP2
Optical Scan
515,023 Registered Voters
Total Votes
376,001
this method
73.01% voting
10 counties

6.46% of registered voters
Votes For Bush

230,653

61.34% of this voting method
Votes For
Kerry


136,282

36.25% of this voting method
Votes For
Other
Candidates


9,066

2.41% of this voting method
Provider of
Voting Machines:


Election
Systems
Software Inc.

Votes Broken Down By Race For OP2 Punch Card Method:

% of Vote Total Votes Race Republican
Votes
% of Votes Democrat
Votes
% of Votes Other
Candidates
Votes
% of Votes
2.16% 8,120 Black 1,462 18.00% 6,496 80.00% 162 2.00%
1.57% 5,916 Hispanic 2,603 44.00% 3,135 53.00% 177 3.00%
2.34% 8,807 Other Race 2,642 30.00% 6,077 69.00% 88 1.00%
93.92 353,158 White 223,946 63.413% 120,573 34.142% 8,638 2.446%
100% 376,001 -Totals- 230,653 61.34% 136,282 36.25%% 9,066 2.411%

Provisional Ballots Still To Be Counted: 972 for this type of voting and counties


E1
Electronic Voting
33,094 Registered Voters
Total Votes
22,528
this method
68.07% voting
1 county
Augalize

Low Black/Hispanic/Other
1.64% of population

.41% of registered voters
Votes For Bush

16,437

72.96% of this voting method
Votes For
Kerry


5,729

25.43% of this voting method
Votes For
Others


362

1.61% of this voting method
Provider of
Voting Machines:


Election
Systems
Software Inc.

Votes Broken Down By Race For E1 Electronic Method:

% of Vote Total Votes Race Republican
Votes
% of Votes Democrat
Votes
% of Votes Other
Candidates
Votes
% of Votes
.27% 61 Black 11 18.00% 49 80.00% 1 2.00%
.77% 173 Hispanic 76 44.00% 92 53.00% 5 3.00%
1.13% 255 Other Race 77 30.00% 176 69.00% 3 1.00%
97.83 22,039 White 16,274 73.840% 5,413 24.560% 447 2.030%
100% 22,528 -Totals- 16,437 72.96% 5,729 25.43% 456 2.026%

Provisional Ballots Still To Be Counted: -0- for this type of voting and counties

Here in Augalize, only 1.64% of the population is Black, Hispanic or Other. 97.83% in white race. There were 22,528 votes cast. Kerry would have received 80% of the Black vote, 53% of the Hispanic and 69% of the other races. Will compare this later below to the other electronic voting machine votes. This leaves approximately 22,039 white votes cast in Augalize. At the percentage rates above cast for each candidate, approximate white votes were cast for Bush, 16,437, Kerry, 5,729, other candidates, 456. This represents that Kerry received approximately, 25.43% of the total vote, Bush 72.96% of the total vote.

E2
Electronic Voting
845,720 Registered Voters
Total Votes
515,472
this method
60.95% voting
1 county

Franklin

High Black/Hispanic/Other
26.79% of population


10.61% of registered voters
Votes For Bush

234,196

45.43% of this voting method
Votes For
Kerry


275,573

53.46% of this voting method
Votes For
Others


5,703

1.11% of this voting method
Provider of
Voting Machines:


Danaher
Guardian
Controls Inc.

Votes Broken Down By Race For E2 Electronic Method:

% of Vote Total Votes Race Republican
Votes
% of Votes Democrat
Votes
% of Votes Other
Candidates
Votes
% of Votes
21.78% 112,246 Black 20,204 18.00% 89,797 80.00% 2,245 2.00%
2.77% 14,254 Hispanic 6,272 44.00% 7,555 53.00% 428 3.00%
5.31% 27,388 Other Race 8,216 30.00% 18,898 69.00% 274 1.00%
70.15% 361,584 White 199,504 55.175 159,324 44.063% 2,757 0.762%
100% 515,472 -Totals- 234,196 45.43%% 275,573 53.46% 5,703 1.106%

Provisional Ballots Still To Be Counted: 14,446 for this type of voting and counties

Here in Franklin, you have 26.79% of the population is Black, Hispanic or Other. There were 515,472 votes cast. The actual votes from the election results show that Kerry got 53.46% of the white vote, and Bush 45.43% of the white vote. However, when you look at Augalize above, you see that Kerry supposedly only received 44.063% of the white vote. This doesn't come close to polls and studies taken in Ohio concerning who people were going to vote for. One can easily come to the conclusion that in Auglaize county something is amiss with the white vote not being properly calculated for the correct candidate.

E3
Electronic Voting
110,479 Registered Voters
Total Votes
80,642
this method
72.99% voting
3 counties

Knox,Pickaway,Ross

Medium
Black/Hispanic/Other
6.82% of population

1.38% of registered voters
Votes For Bush

47,481

58.88% of this voting method
Votes For
Kerry


31,702

39.31% of this voting method
Votes For
Others


1,459

1.81% of this voting method
Provider of
Voting Machines:


Microvote
General
Corporation

Votes Broken Down By Race For E3 Electronic Method:

% of Vote Total Votes Race Republican
Votes
% of Votes Democrat
Votes
% of Votes Other
Candidates
Votes
% of Votes
8.76% 5,449 Black 981 18.00% 4,359 80.00% 109 2.00%
.66% 532 Hispanic 234 44.00% 282 53.00% 16 3.00%
.68% 14,995 Other Race 548 30.00% 164 69.00% 378 1.00%
91.90% 80,642 White 47,133 58.88%% 26,683 36.000% 1,676 2.362%
100% 80,642 -Totals- 47,133 58.88% 26,683 36.000% 1,676 2.241%

Provisional Ballots Still To Be Counted: -0- for this type of voting and counties

In Knox, Pickaway and Ross counties, 6.82% of the population is Black, Hispanic or Other. There were 80,472 votes cast. Actual results from the election results show that Bush got 58.88% of the total vote and Bush 39.31% of the total vote. However, when you look at Augalize above where Kerry supposedly only received 24.560% to Kerry's 36.000% of the white vote in these 3 counties and Kerry's 44.063% of the white vote in Franklin county. This again does not appear to be correct even if you apply a + or - 3.0% error rate. One can easily see that not only in Knox, Pickaway and Ross counties that something is amiss with the white vote, but that with Augalize where Kerry supposedly only received 24.560% of the white vote. Something is definitely amiss here.


E4
Electronic Voting
160,165 Registered Voters
Total Votes
119,657
this method
74.71% voting
1 county

Lake

Medium
Black/Hispanic/Other
6.31 of population

2.01% of registered voters
Votes For Bush

60,615

50.68% of this voting method
Votes For
Kerry


57,471

48.03% of this voting method
Votes For
Others


1,571

1.31% of this voting method
Provider of
Voting Machines:


Microvote
Sequoia
Voting
Systems Inc.

Votes Broken Down By Race For E4 Electronic Method:

% of Vote Total Votes Race Republican
Votes
% of Votes Democrat
Votes
% of Votes Other
Candidates
Votes
% of Votes
2.07% 2,480 Black 446 18.00% 1,984 80.00% 50 2.00%
1.78% 2,125 Hispanic 935 44.00% 1,126 53.00% 64 3.00%
0.95% 1,131 Other Race 339 30.00% 780 69.00% 11 1.00%
95.21% 113,921 White 58,895 51,598% 53,580 47,033% 1,447 1.270%
100% 119,657 -Totals- 60,615 50.68%% 57,471 48.03% 1,571 1.313%

Provisional Ballots Still To Be Counted: -0- for this type of voting and counties

Here in Lake county, again you have 6.31% of the population that is Black, Hispanic or Other. According to the actual voting results, Bush received 50.68% of the total vote and Kerry receivev 48.03%. However, when you look at Augalize above, Kerry received 25.430% of the white vote. In Konx, Pickaway and Ross, Kerry received 36.000% of the white vote. In Franklin Kerry received 44.063% of the white vote. Here in Lake county, Kerry received 47.033% of the white vote. These significant differences in the white vote between these counties is showing that something is not correct.

E5
Electronic Voting
194,673 Registered Voters
Total Votes
131,938
this method
67.77% voting
1 county

Mahoning

High
Black/Hispanic/Other
21.92% of population

2.44% of registered voters
Votes For Bush

47,968

36.36% of this voting method
Votes For
Kerry


81,500

61.77% of this voting method
Votes For
Others


2,470

1.87% of this voting method
Provider of
Voting Machines:


Touchscreens
Election
Systems
Software Inc.

Votes Broken Down By Race For E5 Electronic Method:

% of Vote Total Votes Race Republican
Votes
% of Votes Democrat
Votes
% of Votes Other
Candidates
Votes
% of Votes
17.58% 23,197 Black 4,175 18.00% 18,558 80.00% 464 2.00%
3.29% 4,335 Hispanic 1,907 44.00% 2,298 53.00% 130 3.00%
0.13% 172 Other Race 52 30.00% 119 69.00% 2 1.00%
79.% 104,234 White 41,833 40.134% 60,527 58.068%% 1,874 %
100% 131,938 -Totals- 47,968 36.38% 81,500 61.77% 2,470 1.872%

Provisional Ballots Still To Be Counted: 2,717 for this type of voting and counties

Here in Mahoning county, you have 21.92% of the population is Black, Hispanic or Other. There were 131,938 votes cast. Actual election results show that Bush received 36.66% of the white vote, and Bush 61.77% of the white vote. However, when Augalize county is compared where Kerry received 25.43% of the white vote to Knox, Pickaway and Ross, Kerry received 36.000% of the white vote. In Franklin county, Kerry received 44.063% of the white vote compared to Mahoning, Kerry received 58.068% of the white vote. It is not difficult to conclude that because of these wide variations in the white vote, that something is amiss with the white vote not being properly calculated for the correct candidates in many of these counties.


Below are the actual election results for 2004 that was obtained from the Ohio State website as of 11-5-2004 for the 88 counties. Combined on this spreadsheet are the 2000 elections results with registered voters in 2000 compared to 2004. The red higlighted columns are the counties that were won by Bush, the blue by Kerry. The percentages were computed concerning the increase of both Republican and Democrat votes of 2004 over 2000. Pay special attention to these columns that are highlighted in "yellow". These are very high increases of votes cast for each party in 2004 over 2000. There were a couple though of actual decreases. This was important to compute. By seeing what these increase/decreases were in each county and comparing these separately for Republican and Democrat votes cast and the percentage that each party/candidate carried in each county, these difference show that the numbers simply do not add up by any means. The question is not, "Where's the beef?", but rather..."Where's the vote?"

If you are going to print this column, make sure you change your print setup from portrait to landscape, otherwise, the spreadsheets will not properly print out.

In closing, I believe the following measures need to be implemented by State Officals nationwide concerning how states are going to provide an accurate vote to where "every vote" is not only counted, but counted correctly.

1:) A magnetic strip photo ID voting card needs to be implemented in every County Clerk's office in this country. The card will not only have the person's photo on it to prevent voter fraud, but will be encoded magnetically with the person's unique voter number, [ not social security number, the SS # is not to be used by law for identifying purposes]. This eliminates voter fraud. If the voter loses his voting card, he will have to re-register and get a new one to be able to vote. No exceptions.

2:) Same day registration must be standard across the country where they will receive their photo ID card. This will eliminate the provisional ballot time consuming counting problem after elections. The voter will vote at the registration site, not anywhere else this time.

3:) All voting equipment will be of standard basic design where it will "accept" the voter ID card above. Manufactuers of electronic voting equipment will have to comply.

4:) All equipment must have a "backup" system and be tested and certified before its use.

5:) When the voter goes to vote, he will one of two things. Sign the county log book of registered voters or if it is computerized, a voting form will be printed out that the voter will sign.

6:) The equipment will have to "print" out a voter receipt along with a another receipt that shows the transaction of voting that will be either be stapled to the voting printed document above for the voter, or the separate voting receipts taken from each voter will be counted and stapled in groups of 10, the grouped into groups of 100, then 1000 during the day. This is done so that at the end of the day, the total voting receipts or forms counted must balance back to the total votes from the voting machines.

There must be a paper trail of voting. Too many things can happen during election day. Equipment malfunction that has been reported where machines lose vote count or the hacking into electronic machines. The main frame crashes and or equipment crashes and all vote totals are lost. By having a receipt of the votes that were recorded for each candidate, if need be, these can then be manually counted due to any failures of the machines or for audit purposes. This receipt can be a small receipt such as you get at Walmart when you purchase things. It will not have the name of the person on the receipt, only the voting information.

7:) If someone shows up at the wrong precinct. Poll workers will find the correct precinct for the voter to vote at by the voters address. Each precinct will have a cell phone where the poll worker can call the county clerks office where the information will be looked up. The voter will have two choices, go to that precinct, or go to the County Clerk's office to vote. This elminates any voter fraud.

It is very apparent from the mess that I have seen regarding the voting problems all across America, that the county and state election officals simply do not have their act together. There is no cohesive uniform plan that needs to be installed nationwide. Officials nationwide must find and agree on a standard electronic voting method and equipment. that must be in design be of the same design and features. All software to run these machines must be certified by a minimum of 2 outside sources. That is why there should be a national voting conference of both state an county election officials to get this moving and in place before the next national election.

I leave you with this.

For those that cannot or do not want to see that this country has a huge voting credibility problem, I ask this?

What must happen before you "fix" the system correctly? Is this issue being handled by Americans in the same manner as they do other issues? Are Americans simply sitting around until the day of reckoning where "nothing" is working as it should. We have in my opinion already hit that day of reckoning, nothing is working correctly or uniformly.

Get envolved with your local county and state officials and demand that this problem be solved today.

We must not forsake our freedom of our vote. We will if we do not fix this problem now.

The center of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the belief that each vote be private, that each vote be secure, and that each vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. By what I have seen this election, I strongly believe what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question.

And evidently so do over 5,000 thousands other Americans. So upset over this election they have been voicing their displeasure by posting photos with signs of their comments on this website, www.sorryeverybody.com The site is averaging additions of 1,000 per day.

If you want to help expose voter fraud, then join forces with Bev Harris who runs the non-profit organization,
BlackBoxVoting.Org
BlackBoxVoting.org. They are investigating these types of voter fraud not only in Ohio but across the country. Please help Bev Harris and her organization by contributing to the organization. You can do so on the site.

My fellow Americans, do not sit back and be quiet, stand up and be counted.

And if you suffer from aspartame poisoning, be sure to visit Mary Stoddard and Jim Turner's Aspartame Consumer Safety Network . Mary was the first consumer advocate in 1987 to educate consumers on this deadlty chemical sweetener.

Stoddard's and Turner's site provides eye opening information about the artificial sweetener, aspartame - presented in a rational, intelligent manner. Both are the original pioneers of the international anti-aspartame movement. Journalist, Mary Nash Stoddard and Washington attorney, James Turner, Esq. have been instrumental in educating the general public around the world as to the reported dangers of aspartame. Their site is the one media, like 60-Minutes, that people go to when they have questions about this issue and need answers from the experts.

Aspartame Consumer Safety Network www.aspartamesafety.com

Make sure you read my column on this deadly chemical sweetener as well:

Aspartame Sweetness Disguised as Disease or Death?
Also Known As Equal®, Nutrasweet® and Spoonful®

To each and everyone, have a Happy and Blessed Thanksgiving!

Until next time....

~ David Lawrence Dewey


Complete Listing of 2000 and 2004 Election Results Compared
* includes voter registration totals for each county and analysis of increase/decrease of voting

OHIO
RESULTS
County:
Registered
Voters
2000
Registered
Voters
2004
Total
Voting
Republican
Candidate
2000
Total
Voting
Democrat
Candidate
2000
Total
Voting
Republican
Candidate
2004
Total
Voting
Democrat
Candidate
2004
Total
Votes
Cast
All Votes
2000
Total
Votes
To Other
Candidates
2000
Total
Votes
Cast
All Votes
2004
Total
Votes
To Other
Candidates
2004
Total
Voting
%
To Registered
Voters
2004
Total
Voting
%
To Registered
Voters
2000
Increased
Decreased
Voters
%
Voting
Over
2000
Total
Increased
Votes
Over
2000
Total
%
Increased
Votes
Over
2000
Percent
Increase
Republican
Votes
Over
2000
Number
Increase
Republican
Votes
Over
2000
Percent
Increase
Democrats
Votes
Over
2000
Number
Increase
Democrats
Votes
Over
2000
Provisional
Ballots
For Kerry
Adams 17,650 17,696 6,380 3,581 7,480 4,189 10,235 274 12,094 425 68.52% 57.84% 10.68% 1,708 17.15% 17.24% 1,100 16.98% 608  
Allen 67,950 68,174 28,647 13,996 31,629 15,822 43,795 1,152 48,121 670 70.82% 64.24% 6.58% 4,808 11.28% 10.41% 2,982 13.05% 1,826  
Ashland 30,988 34,847 13,533 6,685 15,826 8,345 21,258 1,040 25,171 1,000 81.23% 61.00% 20.22% 3,953 19.55% 16.94% 2,293 24.83% 1,660  
Ashtabula 66,390 62,926 17,940 19,831 20,621 23,545 39,472 1,701 45,474 1,308 68.50% 62.73% 5.77% 6,395 16.93% 14.94% 2,681 18.73% 3,714 1142
Athens 48,356 45,100 9,703 13,158 9,912 17,369 25,447 2,586 27,960 679 57.82% 56.42% 1.40% 4,420 19.33% 2.15% 209 32.00% 4,211 2504
Auglaize 28,693 33,094 13,770 5,564 16,437 5,729 19,892 558 22,528 362 78.51% 60.11% 18.41% 2,832 14.65% 19.37% 2,667 2.97% 165  
Belmont 51,504 44,452 12,625 15,980 15,275 17,256 30,141 1,536 33,452 921 64.95% 67.81% -2.86% 3,926 13.72% 20.99% 2,650 7.98% 1,276 1067
Brown 26,955 28,922 10,027 5,972 12,480 7,058 16,429 430 20,030 492 74.31% 56.80% 17.50% 3,539 22.12% 24.46% 2,453 18.18% 1,086  
Butler 216,275 238,117 86,587 46,390 106,735 54,185 136,737 3,760 163,668 2,748 75.68% 57.42% 18.25% 27,943 21.01% 23.27% 20,148 16.80% 7,795  
Carroll 19,075 20,076 6,732 4,960 7,531 6,190 12,261 569 14,172 451 74.30% 61.07% 13.22% 2,029 17.35% 11.87% 799 24.80% 1,230  
Champaign 26,792 25,376 9,220 5,955 11,432 6,752 15,680 505 18,564 380 69.29% 61.79% 7.50% 3,009 19.83% 23.99% 2,212 13.38% 797  
Clark 89,550 89,683 27,660 27,984 34,444 32,824 57,559 1,915 68,883 1,615 76.92% 64.18% 12.74% 11,624 20.89% 24.53% 6,784 17.30% 4,840  
Clermont 114,186 125,823 47,129 20,927 61,694 25,318 69,877 1,821 88,019 1,007 77.08% 55.54% 21.55% 18,956 27.85% 30.90% 14,565 20.98% 4,391  
Clinton 24,023 25,092 9,824 4,791 12,625 5,244 15,070 455 18,177 308 75.66% 60.06% 15.61% 3,254 22.26% 28.51% 2,801 9.46% 453  
Columbiana 74,297 78,536 21,804 20,657 25,212 22,884 44,427 1,966 49,249 1,153 66.29% 56.57% 9.72% 5,635 13.27% 15.63% 3,408 10.78% 2,227  
Coshocton 21,066 22,679 8,243 5,594 9,121 6,763 14,268 431 17,331 1,447 82.27% 62.91% 19.36% 2,047 14.79% 10.65% 878 20.90% 1,169  
Crawford 31,344 29,591 11,666 6,721 13,667 7,626 19,176 789 21,906 613 69.89% 64.80% 5.09% 2,906 15.80% 17.15% 2,001 13.47% 905  
Cuyahoga 1,010,726 1,005,807 192,099 359,913 215,624 433,262 574,782 22,770 665,334 16,448 65.83% 57.15% 8.68% 96,874 17.55% 12.25% 23,525 20.38% 73,349 24788
Darke 36,088 38,290 14,817 7,741 17,869 7,663 23,267 709 26,379 847 73.10% 60.77% 12.33% 2,974 13.18% 20.60% 3,052 -1.01% (78)  
Defiance 25,783 25,847 9,540 6,175 11,018 6,683 16,242 527 18,169 468 70.47% 62.84% 7.63% 1,986 12.64% 15.49% 1,478 8.23% 508  
Delaware 80,132 100,676 36,639 17,134 52,237 26,491 55,403 1,630 79,691 963 99.45% 55.03% 44.42% 24,955 46.41% 42.57% 15,598 54.61% 9,357  
Erie 55,777 55,517 16,105 17,732 18,019 20,652 35,015 1,178 39,690 1,019 71.16% 63.07% 8.09% 4,834 14.29% 11.88% 1,914 16.47% 2,920 972
Fairfield 81,544 91,498 33,523 19,065 42,057 24,321 54,094 1,506 67,632 1,254 82.94% 59.12% 23.82% 13,790 26.22% 25.46% 8,534 27.57% 5,256  
Fayette 14,713 16,093 5,685 3,363 7,221 4,244 9,278 230 11,704 239 79.55% 57.65% 21.90% 2,417 26.71% 27.02% 1,536 26.20% 881  
Franklin 681,949 845,720 197,862 202,018 234,196 275,573 414,074 14,194 515,472 5,703 75.59% 48.96% 26.63% 109,889 27.48% 18.36% 36,334 36.41% 73,555 14446
Fulton 27,840 28,561 11,546 6,805 13,443 8,098 18,896 545 21,902 361 78.67% 66.16% 12.51% 3,190 17.38% 16.43% 1,897 19.00% 1,293  
Gallia 21,681 23,567 7,511 4,872 8,320 5,188 12,776 393 13,944 436 64.31% 54.21% 10.10% 1,125 9.09% 10.77% 809 6.49% 316  
Geauga 62,518 65,393 25,417 15,327 29,957 19,571 42,600 1,856 51,286 1,758 82.03% 65.14% 16.89% 8,784 21.56% 17.86% 4,540 27.69% 4,244  
Greene 98,261 105,079 37,946 25,059 46,841 29,349 65,204 2,199 77,830 1,640 79.21% 62.05% 17.16% 13,185 20.93% 23.44% 8,895 17.12% 4,290  
Guernsey 24,452 27,129 8,181 6,643 9,095 7,072 15,430 606 16,570 403 67.77% 56.88% 10.89% 1,343 9.06% 11.17% 914 6.46% 429  
Hamilton 585,985 573,612 204,175 161,578 215,639 190,956 377,899 12,146 418,001 11,406 71.33% 65.88% 5.45% 40,842 11.17% 5.61% 11,464 18.18% 29,378  
Hancock 46,334 49,607 20,985 8,798 24,345 9,930 30,617 834 35,087 812 75.73% 61.72% 14.01% 4,492 15.08% 16.01% 3,360 12.87% 1,132  
Hardin 19,716 18,921 7,124 4,557 8,187 4,723 12,068 387 13,146 236 66.68% 63.78% 2.90% 1,229 10.52% 14.92% 1,063 3.64% 166  
Harrison 11,052 11,769 3,417 3,351 4,318 3,824 7,161 393 8,410 268 76.09% 60.85% 15.25% 1,374 20.30% 26.37% 901 14.12% 473  
Henry 19,503 19,685 8,530 4,367 9,770 5,027 13,252 355 15,188 391 77.88% 67.32% 10.55% 1,900 14.73% 14.54% 1,240 15.11% 660  
Highland 24,818 28,243 9,728 5,328 11,871 6,012 15,447 391 18,323 440 73.83% 54.69% 19.14% 2,827 18.78% 22.03% 2,143 12.84% 684  
Hocking 16,881 18,378 5,702 4,474 6,821 6,065 10,756 580 13,258 372 78.54% 58.53% 20.01% 2,710 26.63% 19.62% 1,119 35.56% 1,591  
Holmes 16,766 18,089 6,754 2,066 8,299 2,622 9,145 325 11,542 621 68.84% 50.56% 18.29% 2,101 23.82% 22.88% 1,545 26.91% 556  
Huron 37,533 37,436 12,286 8,183 14,553 10,354 21,360 891 25,584 677 68.16% 57.06% 11.11% 4,438 21.68% 18.45% 2,267 26.53% 2,171  
Jackson 23,118 23,997 6,958 5,131 8,382 5,519 12,490 401 14,332 431 61.99% 52.05% 9.95% 1,812 14.99% 20.47% 1,424 7.56% 388  
Jefferson 55,278 49,655 15,038 17,488 16,887 18,674 34,636 2,110 36,528 967 66.08% 69.75% -3.67% 3,035 9.33% 12.30% 1,849 6.78% 1,186 650
Knox 35,140 36,971 13,393 7,133 16,677 9,613 21,260 734 26,661 371 75.87% 57.50% 18.37% 5,764 28.08% 24.52% 3,284 34.77% 2,480  
Lake 152,858 160,165 51,747 46,497 60,615 57,471 102,564 4,320 119,657 1,571 78.28% 64.04% 14.24% 19,842 20.20% 17.14% 8,868 23.60% 10,974  
Lawrence 44,032 41,424 12,531 11,307 15,178 11,874 24,452 614 27,876 824 63.31% 59.03% 4.28% 3,214 13.48% 21.12% 2,647 5.01% 567  
Licking 98,787 111,387 37,180 23,196 48,092 29,350 62,466 2,090 78,876 1,434 79.84% 56.08% 23.76% 17,066 28.27% 29.35% 10,912 26.53% 6,154  
Logan 30,494 29,406 11,849 5,945 14,084 6,644 18,455 661 21,135 407 69.31% 62.76% 6.55% 2,934 16.49% 18.86% 2,235 11.76% 699  
Lorain 185,982 196,601 47,957 59,809 59,751 76,512 112,180 4,414 139,069 2,806 74.78% 57.06% 17.72% 28,497 26.44% 24.59% 11,794 27.93% 16,703 4134
Lucas 298,505 302,136 73,342 108,344 85,405 128,874 187,350 5,664 216,453 2,174 72.51% 62.01% 10.50% 32,593 17.94% 16.45% 12,063 18.95% 20,530 6719
Madison 23,221 23,477 8,892 5,287 10,931 6,080 14,667 488 17,451 440 75.15% 62.47% 12.68% 2,832 19.97% 22.93% 2,039 15.00% 793  
Mahoning 179,545 194,673 40,460 69,212 47,968 81,500 114,119 4,447 131,938 2,470 73.48% 58.62% 14.86% 19,796 18.05% 18.56% 7,508 17.75% 12,288 2717
Marion 41,788 43,323 13,617 10,370 16,729 11,492 24,815 828 28,762 541 68.83% 57.28% 11.55% 4,234 17.65% 22.85% 3,112 10.82% 1,122  
Medina 102,535 118,330 37,349 26,635 47,499 35,725 66,883 2,899 84,725 1,501 82.63% 56.52% 26.11% 19,240 30.07% 27.18% 10,150 34.13% 9,090  
Meigs 16,242 15,205 5,750 3,674 6,156 4,334 9,795 371 10,813 323 66.57% 64.42% 2.15% 1,066 11.31% 7.06% 406 17.96% 660  
Mercer 25,079 31,306 12,485 5,212 15,022 4,924 18,294 597 20,478 532 81.65% 58.44% 23.22% 2,249 12.71% 20.32% 2,537 -5.53% (288)  
Miami 66,765 72,169 26,037 15,584 33,039 17,039 42,841 1,220 50,562 484 75.73% 59.36% 16.37% 8,457 20.32% 26.89% 7,002 9.34% 1,455  
Monroe 11,156 10,350 3,145 3,605 3,370 4,164 7,115 365 7,857 323 70.43% 68.74% 1.68% 784 11.61% 7.15% 225 15.51% 559 132
Montgomery 371,790 391,914 109,792 114,597 134,716 138,262 230,987 6,598 279,801 6,823 75.26% 58.94% 16.32% 48,589 21.65% 22.70% 24,924 20.65% 23,665 9227
Morgan 9,405 9,358 3,451 2,261 3,695 2,810 5,993 281 6,770 265 71.98% 64.04% 7.94% 793 13.88% 7.07% 244 24.28% 549  
Morrow 21,184 24,249 7,842 4,529 10,313 5,651 12,839 468 16,403 439 77.43% 52.95% 24.48% 3,593 29.04% 31.51% 2,471 24.77% 1,122  
Muskingum 54,355 51,552 17,995 13,415 21,901 16,050 32,624 1,214 38,817 866 71.41% 63.28% 8.13% 6,541 20.82% 21.71% 3,906 19.64% 2,635  
Noble 8,408 8,879 3,435 2,296 3,799 2,618 5,988 257 6,715 298 79.86% 67.44% 12.42% 686 11.97% 10.60% 364 14.02% 322  
Ottawa 28,726 30,251 9,917 9,485 11,820 10,915 19,968 566 23,052 317 80.25% 66.01% 14.24% 3,333 17.18% 19.19% 1,903 15.08% 1,430  
Paulding 14,104 14,226 5,210 3,384 6,074 3,544 8,946 352 9,881 263 70.06% 62.88% 7.17% 1,024 11.92% 16.58% 864 4.73% 160  
Perry 18,102 23,480 6,440 5,895 7,767 7,205 12,828 493 15,328 356 84.68% 54.63% 30.04% 2,637 21.38% 20.61% 1,327 22.22% 1,310  
Pickaway 29,155 30,045 10,717 6,598 13,864 8,388 17,740 425 22,579 327 77.44% 59.04% 18.40% 4,937 28.51% 29.36% 3,147 27.13% 1,790  
Pike 20,396 19,661 5,333 4,923 6,385 5,865 10,560 304 12,708 458 62.31% 53.71% 8.60% 1,994 19.44% 19.73% 1,052 19.13% 942  
Portage 100,554 109,565 28,271 31,446 35,054 39,915 62,899 3,182 76,306 1,337 75.89% 57.41% 18.48% 15,252 25.54% 23.99% 6,783 26.93% 8,469 1445
Preble 27,718 28,137 11,176 6,375 13,512 7,165 18,166 615 21,226 549 76.58% 64.56% 12.02% 3,126 17.81% 20.90% 2,336 12.39% 790  
Putnam 24,105 24,572 12,837 4,063 14,196 4,348 17,344 444 18,948 404 78.61% 70.58% 8.02% 1,644 9.73% 10.59% 1,359 7.01% 285  
Richland 82,059 95,359 30,138 20,572 36,253 24,056 52,779 2,069 61,907 1,598 75.44% 55.35% 20.09% 9,599 18.93% 20.29% 6,115 16.94% 3,484  
Ross 39,400 43,463 13,706 11,662 16,940 13,701 26,016 648 31,402 761 79.70% 59.86% 19.84% 5,273 20.79% 23.60% 3,234 17.48% 2,039  
Sandusky 40,769 39,408 13,699 11,146 17,824 13,909 25,744 899 32,433 700 79.55% 65.33% 14.23% 6,888 27.72% 30.11% 4,125 24.79% 2,763  
Scioto 49,729 48,012 15,022 13,997 17,938 16,438 29,945 926 35,317 941 71.02% 62.37% 8.65% 5,357 18.46% 19.41% 2,916 17.44% 2,441  
Seneca 35,917 37,974 13,863 9,512 15,624 10,770 24,351 976 27,148 754 75.59% 64.13% 11.46% 3,019 12.92% 12.70% 1,761 13.23% 1,258  
Shelby 29,578 28,460 12,476 6,593 15,825 6,337 19,670 601 22,688 526 76.71% 69.11% 7.59% 3,093 16.22% 26.84% 3,349 -3.88% (256)  
Stark 240,794 267,939 78,153 75,308 89,859 92,295 159,844 6,383 186,252 4,098 77.35% 59.66% 17.69% 28,693 18.70% 14.98% 11,706 22.56% 16,987 6653
Summit 354,189 368,858 96,721 119,759 116,184 152,897 224,839 8,359 275,551 6,470 77.80% 60.96% 16.84% 52,601 24.30% 20.12% 19,463 27.67% 33,138 5932
Trumbull 145,019 142,548 34,654 57,643 40,220 65,321 96,239 3,942 108,533 2,992 74.84% 67.51% 7.33% 13,244 14.35% 16.06% 5,566 13.32% 7,678 2700
Tuscarawas 57,546 55,656 19,549 15,879 23,359 18,460 37,118 1,690 42,871 1,052 74.50% 66.69% 7.81% 6,391 18.04% 19.49% 3,810 16.25% 2,581  
Union 25,981 30,200 11,502 5,040 15,593 6,546 17,024 482 22,515 376 86.66% 56.37% 30.29% 5,597 33.84% 35.57% 4,091 29.88% 1,506  
Van Wert 21,841 21,100 8,679 4,209 10,484 4,026 13,219 331 15,252 742 69.83% 62.65% 7.18% 1,622 12.59% 20.80% 1,805 -4.35% (183)  
Vinton 8,595 8,527 2,720 2,037 3,194 2,612 4,946 189 6,059 253 70.49% 58.00% 12.49% 1,049 22.05% 17.43% 474 28.23% 575  
Warren 96,536 125,919 48,318 19,142 66,523 25,399 69,078 1,618 93,321 1,399 96.67% 54.86% 41.81% 24,462 36.26% 37.68% 18,205 32.69% 6,257  
Washington 40,969 40,881 15,342 10,383 17,029 12,137 26,515 790 29,707 541 72.51% 64.86% 7.65% 3,441 13.38% 11.00% 1,687 16.89% 1,754  
Wayne 62,395 69,672 25,901 14,779 31,433 19,455 42,436 1,756 51,898 1,010 83.18% 60.91% 22.27% 10,208 25.09% 21.36% 5,532 31.64% 4,676  
Williams 26,683 26,772 9,941 5,454 11,633 6,231 15,919 524 18,324 460 68.67% 59.46% 9.21% 2,469 16.04% 17.02% 1,692 14.25% 777  
Wood 84,715 91,492 27,504 22,687 32,574 28,216 52,194 2,003 61,865 1,075 73.03% 57.05% 15.98% 10,599 21.12% 18.43% 5,070 24.37% 5,529  
Wyandot 15,167 15,834 6,113 3,397 6,956 3,554 9,827 317 10,785 275 71.11% 62.06% 9.05% 1,000 10.52% 13.79% 843 4.62% 157  
TOTAL 7,531,555 7,979,639 2,351,209 2,186,190 2,796,147 2,659,664 4,705,457 168,058 5,574,476 118,665 69.86% 62.48% 7.38% 918,412 20.24% 18.92% 444,938 21.66% 473,474 85,228


© All Rights Reserved. Use of these collected data is restricted.
Newspapers, syndicates or publications wishing to use this information or his columns, email your request with details to Mr. Dewey's agent. Email Contacts for DL Dewey. For any other use, DLDEWEY for permission to use column or columns, detailing your request to use which column or columns and for what purpose.

HOME Previous Columns Email Contacts Advertising
©1997 - 2005
DL DEWEY
Updated January 1st, 2005
Email Contacts